Fun - Woud you rather..?

[Midamoto]

A) Piss on a child,

or

B) Have a child piss on you

So easy. I'll take B everyday.

Okay, time for a classic trolley problem. You're steering an unstoppable trolley, before you the tracks split. If you steer right, you will kill Gandhi, if you steer left, you will kill three 6yo orphans. Would you rather...

• steer right and kill Gandhi,
• steer left and kill the three orphans?

[Robotboy]

Okay, time for a classic trolley problem. You're steering an unstoppable trolley, before you the tracks split. If you steer right, you will kill Gandhi, if you steer left, you will kill three 6yo orphans. Would you rather...

• steer right and kill Gandhi,
• steer left and kill the three orphans?

I mean Gandhi gets killed anyways so like when are we talking about? I'll assume it's before he did anything important but with the knowledge of what he will do.

So I'm going left. Sadly orphans are almost set up to fail and live a hard life. It sounds harsh but killing Gandhi before he does anything important is worse. Now if he's teleported there moments before he gets shot, well that changes everything.

You are going to die and the world will know how you died. Would you rather

? Trip, faceplant in a puddle and drown

or

^ Have a flowerpot land on your head while walking in a city.

[on the rocks]

You are going to die and the world will know how you died. Would you rather

? Trip, faceplant in a puddle and drown

or

^ Have a flowerpot land on your head while walking in a city.

I'll pass on the drowning and take the blow to the head; seems much faster.  Never know what hitme, just maybe hear someone shout "Look out!" and then nothing.  Besides, I can appreciate the humor in dying an almost cartoonish death.  I just hope it was a literal cat and mouse chase that knocked the pot off the building.



Let's say your a prepubescent child; would you rather be molested by a relatively cute teenage boy who doesn't really know what he's doing or would you rather have your molester be a less-hot dude about 30 who knows how to make other people orgasm?

[SecondChance]

You are going to die and the world will know how you died. Would you rather

? Trip, faceplant in a puddle and drown

or

^ Have a flowerpot land on your head while walking in a city.

I'll pass on the drowning and take the blow to the head; seems much faster.  Never know what hitme, just maybe hear someone shout "Look out!" and then nothing.  Besides, I can appreciate the humor in dying an almost cartoonish death.  I just hope it was a literal cat and mouse chase that knocked the pot off the building.



Let's say your a prepubescent child; would you rather be molested by a relatively cute teenage boy who doesn't really know what he's doing or would you rather have your molester be a less-hot dude about 30 who knows how to make other people orgasm?

I would rather enjoy the experience, so I'd pick the 30 year old who would make is pleasurable for me.

Would you rather work for a terrible boss but make a lot of money $$$$$$$$$$
Or work for a wonderful boss and make just enough money to pay your bills $

[ForestWanderer]

lick a cactus. Theres spineless cacti out there like the opuntia cacanapa.

would you rather:

Be a pedo but be irresistable to adult women/men?

or

Not be a pedo but be irresistable to kids?

Be pedo and irresistable to adults. Being irresistable to adults would boost my self confidence and I would still be able to enjoy the beauty of children. But I just cant imagine myself as an exclusive teleiophile.

I would rather enjoy the experience, so I'd pick the 30 year old who would make is pleasurable for me.

Would you rather work for a terrible boss but make a lot of money $$$$$$$$$$
Or work for a wonderful boss and make just enough money to pay your bills $

Work for a wonderful boss and earn not much money. 

Would you be a dog or a cat?

[GentlePedo]

Would you be a dog or a cat?

A cat, totally. I love cats, and I identify with their vision of life. Dogs are boring with their ignorant obedience.

Would you rather

A) Have sex with every child you desire, and they love it and there are no consequences, but you die after a year;

or

B) Live at least 20 more years, in perfect health and happiness, but not ever have sex again.

[Max1]

Would you rather

A) Have sex with every child you desire, and they love it and there are no consequences, but you die after a year;

or

B) Live at least 20 more years, in perfect health and happiness, but not ever have sex again.

I have a grandchild I am deeply in love with so I would have to go with B. Just to watch her grow and be a part of her life.


would you rather

A. be normal and live the life of the wealthy?

OR

B. stay a pedo and be happy but be always broke?

[GentlePedo]

I have a grandchild I am deeply in love with so I would have to go with B. Just to watch her grow and be a part of her life.


would you rather

A. be normal and live the life of the wealthy?

OR

B. stay a pedo and be happy but be always broke?

Totally relatable and understood! I have no grandchildren yet but feel the same about my (adult) children.

Your dilemma is easy peasy to me. I have no desire to be pedophile. I have accepted that I am and I have no problems with being one, but there are still lots of reasons that would make my life more practical and easy if I were just attracted to only adults. And now you offer me that and add a few million bucks on top? SWEEEET DEALL!!!!


Would you rather

A) Receive $1,000 each month for the rest of your live,

or

B) Receive $2,000,000 now

[on the rocks]

Would you rather

A) Receive $1,000 each month for the rest of your live,

or

B) Receive $2,000,000 now

Well unless I think we'll invent immortality this century, I'll take the 2 mill.  A grand a month is 12k a year.  If you lived a hundred years, you're still leaving $800k on the table. Plus, think about how much inflation would gobble up the value of a thousand dollars over that time period.
Good one though, GP.  I had to think about that for a second.



Would you rather
Be the subject of a viral video featuring you doing something clumsy.
or
Be the person who shared the viral video of someone doing something clumsy despite that person pleading with you in the video not to post it.  (So you're the one getting the ad checks from YouTube.)

[PampersLover]

Would you rather

A) Receive $1,000 each month for the rest of your live,

or

B) Receive $2,000,000 now

Well unless I think we'll invent immortality this century, I'll take the 2 mill.  A grand a month is 12k a year.  If you lived a hundred years, you're still leaving $800k on the table. Plus, think about how much inflation would gobble up the value of a thousand dollars over that time period.
Good one though, GP.  I had to think about that for a second.



Would you rather
Be the subject of a viral video featuring you doing something clumsy.
or
Be the person who shared the viral video of someone doing something clumsy despite that person pleading with you in the video not to post it.  (So you're the one getting the ad checks from YouTube.)

I'd rather be the clumsy one. I could never live with the guilt of option B...no matter the ad checks.

Would you rather...

A. Be stripped naked in public?

B. Strip someone naked in public?

[SecondChance]

Would you rather

A) Receive $1,000 each month for the rest of your live,

or

B) Receive $2,000,000 now

Well unless I think we'll invent immortality this century, I'll take the 2 mill.  A grand a month is 12k a year.  If you lived a hundred years, you're still leaving $800k on the table. Plus, think about how much inflation would gobble up the value of a thousand dollars over that time period.
Good one though, GP.  I had to think about that for a second.



Would you rather
Be the subject of a viral video featuring you doing something clumsy.
or
Be the person who shared the viral video of someone doing something clumsy despite that person pleading with you in the video not to post it.  (So you're the one getting the ad checks from YouTube.)

I'd rather be the clumsy one. I could never live with the guilt of option B...no matter the ad checks.

Would you rather...

A. Be stripped naked in public?

B. Strip someone naked in public?

I  would rather strip someone naked in public, because I would die of embarrassment if I were stripped naked.

If you found a peep hole in a children's dressing room, Would you rather...
A. Report it to the manager
B. Pull up a chair and spend the afternoon peeping
A.

[Robotboy]

If you found a peep hole in a children's dressing room, Would you rather...
A. Report it to the manager
B. Pull up a chair and spend the afternoon peeping

B. Until I get bored, that is.

Would you rather:

@ Fight someone in a bunny costume

or

& Have sex with someone in a bunny costume

[Midamoto]

I'll go with option ampersand. I usually, but not always, prefer sex to fighting.

Wouldcha rather,

e (Euler's constant): find the person of your dreams and live a happy life with them, but they're a literal nazi,
e (the letter of the alphabet): find the person of your dreams but they think you're a nazi and hate you?

[GentlePedo]

I'll go with option ampersand. I usually, but not always, prefer sex to fighting.

Wouldcha rather,

e (Euler's constant): find the person of your dreams and live a happy life with them, but they're a literal nazi,
e (the letter of the alphabet): find the person of your dreams but they think you're a nazi and hate you?

If they are a literal nazi then it's impossible that they are the person of my dreams and extremely unlikely I could live a happy life with them. So that leaves just option e (the letter). And I now officially hate you for forcing me to make the person of my dreams hate me, Midamoto! :-P

Would you rather

a) Attain world peace,

or

b) Cure cancer?

[Midamoto]

a) Attain world peace,

or

b) Cure cancer?

Oof, that is a tough but interesting question. Also, bear in mind that if a genie actually gave me that dilemma, I'd have to gather a team of experts and take a year to come up with the right answer because of how important it is.

It all comes down to predicting how many more or less people will die in scenario a vs. scenario b.
Cancer is perhaps the easiest one to tackle. The annual death toll is about 10 million people. But it is also in decline, decreasing by about 2% every year. Even if I choose option a, eventually we will beat cancer. Let us simplify drastically, and assume the idealized scenario where the decrease remains constant and 2%. Integrating this over all of the future I get that cancer has yet to kill about 500 million more people. Let us be very conservative and round it up to a billion.

War is much more difficult to estimate. The weaponry gets deadlier and deadlier with each passing year, but simultaneously we are leaving in the most peaceful period in Human History by far. The issue with war is that it is not a smooth trend that we can interpolate. One year it might kill very few people, whereas the next it might explode in a full-on nuclear conflict and eradicate humanity. It is a very scary prospect, and one that is more and more likely the more time passes. If the eradication of humanity happened today, it would have a death toll of about 8 billion people, which already surpasses the death toll of all future cancer victims.

With those considerations in mind, I am forced to pick option (a) to secure the future of Humanity. Cancer will have to wait a billion more deaths.

Would you rather,

• Solve world hunger?
• Solve climate change?