Children fighting in the war

[Hentai_Senpai]

What do you think about this? Have you encountered this? Have there been such cases in the history of your country?

This is a common phenomenon in the history of my country. In the Middle Ages, men had to mature quickly but also die quickly, women gave birth to many children, many of whom did not survive. A man aged 11-13 was already a man and started a family and went on military expeditions, but there were cases of a person under 10 years of age already leading an 'adult' life.

During the First and Second World Wars it was like a repeat of the Middle Ages. People of this age actively participated in war activities, both boys and girls. The entire society simply accepted this, accepted the desires of these children and made it possible for them to come true. Isn't this a typical pedophile trait, treating children like adults and allowing them to fulfill their strangest desires? Don't I live in a pedophile society? Did they not realize what the consequences would be, how many of these children would die or become disabled for the rest of their lives? Is the great love for the homeland that did not exist on maps for many years and the great dream, the social dream that both adults and children believed in, a good justification for what happened? Secondly, was it not the active participation of children that made the difference? I think it made a difference, if it weren't for this revival and maintenance of my country, it would never have been achieved. All these children were used by adults to achieve a common goal, a common desire that had been drilled into their heads by adults. The achievement of this goal enabled the incredible development of my country and, therefore, the incredible personal development of its citizens, both children and adults, which continues to this day.

What is right and what is not? Is using someone to achieve a higher goal a good or bad thing? Are the beliefs instilled in children correct if they serve to achieve higher goals and the individual's self-development, even if they seem untrue at the moment, here and now? What is true and what is false, what we believe and what society believes in, or what is true at a given moment from an objective point of view? What is objective and true - what is happening in my head or what is happening outside?

[GirlsAreBest]

War is the most hypocritical and contradictory aspect of our world that we still justify compared to our social and even legal norms. All of that goes out the window as soon as those 3 letters are uttered. So you see why I cannot take anyone seriously who gets upset over why a single person hurts a single other person. Harm to many is still far worse regardless of reasoning.

The Joker was right - as soon as the discussion becomes about a group of people expected to be harmed, it suddenly becomes acceptable. When in reality, murder in the name of war is still murder. As far as I am concerned, anyone who takes part in it is no better then Joe the sociopath. And yes, that includes me if I am ever forced into it.

Until we stop making excuses for atrocities committed because of acceptable reasoning it will continue to be the worst thing humanity is capable of.

[hö]

Short and blunt: Kids and guns don't mix.

[Katou]

Many people worry about 10-year-old children learning about sex, a 10-year-old girl who masturbates can't get a vibrator as a gift, imagine the scene, the girl opens it and it's a vibrator in the shape of a penis, maybe some veins standing out , maybe some LED lights, it's very likely that her parents have a lot of problems with the law or with some family members, maybe she doesn't like penises, she prefers a vagina, her brother liked the penis, they exchange gifts, they They already masturbate, they like it, it's fun, they can play with their intimate massagers around the house, but this can cause a lot of problems, maybe a social worker at the door.

Now imagine all this propaganda with children and war and weapons, toy weapons, videos of children learning to shoot, parents taking their children to learn to shoot, placing an object in their hands that could take their life in an accident, that of someone else, then you see parents teaching how to clean, load, aim, shoot a gun, the same child they said can't learn about masturbation in school, but she can learn to kill, she can't see her teacher show It's a plastic sexual organ but you can hold, carry and shoot a real gun.

Children fought in wars, but we don't need to go too far, because children still fight in wars around the world, in my country in some cities it is common to see children in urban wars, people are afraid of them, they discuss lowering the criminal age , they don't care about the circumstances, they don't care if that child was induced into the drug war, these people who don't care usually say that a 13 year old teenager already knows how to decide, a teenager who wakes up to the sound of gunshots of fire and goes to school, then does some work to take food home and needs to carry packages on the way because he knows that if he doesn't transport his mother she could be killed, this child they say has the power to decide not to be in this war , but at the same time they say that this child cannot decide to have sex.

And now we're discussing war plans, we don't even like standing in line, we put our slippers on the ground to mark the position, imagine these civilian people marching?, and some are saying we have to get ready to go fight, and they want us to teenagers learn to shoot, and when someone says we can't encourage these teenagers to enlist, many say it's the circumstances, but they didn't care about the circumstances of teenagers in the middle of urban wars going on right now.

Many governments, municipal, state, federal, only use children, if there is a war they send 18-year-olds, then 16-year-olds, then 14-year-olds and they decrease, while they run and hide in bunkers.

A good world is where children use their fingers to masturbate and not shoot, where adults teach children to use a vibrator and not a gun.

[on the rocks]

Child soldiers are a mark of desperation.  Either the country has exhausted its supply of actual military age males, like those waning days of WWII for the Axis, or they have some ideology that doesn't appeal to neurologically mature humans, so they must resort to 'grooming' adolescents to fight their fight.  Boko Harum being the best example I can think of.  But yeah, major powers are guilty in this arena as well with the pop culture bombarding young boys with heroic imagery and playthings about being a soldier.

Sure there's a natural inclination for boys to play fight already and one can argue that something like GI Joe was popular because that's what the boys liked. But at the same time, it's well documented how the US Military cooperates with Hollywood to make the military seem as cool as possible to young audiences.  Still, it's not at all at the same overt level as a West African terrorist organization like Boko Harum where they straight up take the boys away from their families or pick up orphans and completely control their intake of information.  And it's not at all the same as a totalitarian state that already has raised children to worship their supreme leader so that when it comes time to bolster depleted ranks at the end of a losing war, the children obey and pick up a rifle.

It's unethical because one is purposefully limiting a child's options about what they can do with their life to serve the selfish interest of The State or the Dear Leader or whatever the powers that be are in that situation.

Bringing back around to on topic, which is worse?  Grooming a child to suck a cock or grooming a child to kill the enemy in a war?
I think you all can guess which one I'd pick as worse.

[LikelyHuman]

I'm reminded of scenes I saw of children fighting in the Liberian civil war. There was some interesting forms of ritualistic cannibalism going on during that war. You know, the old standards of eating your enemy's heart to gain their power, and things of that nature. Kind of wild since you'd think by the sounds of it, I would be describing some kind of primitive tribal war or something, but nope. There was a young kid, maybe 10-12 years old, with an AK-47 that had just killed one of the local warlords, filming himself eating his heart. It was a VICE production, and I remember that at the same time I watched another documentary about donkey-fucking in Colombia; apparently there's a pretty rich tradition of that there were young men are even encouraged to practice on donkeys. I recall it because I remember being more shocked at watching a 10 year old mimicking how he gets a donkey wet while his mom watched on, than I was at seeing a 10 year old eating a person's heart. Guess that shows you how effective the anti-pedo programming is.

[GirlsAreBest]

If children can either understand combat and murder or be forced regardless, then they can also give informed consent to sex or be forced regardless. I don't think they should be subjected to any of what I just said. But this just goes to show how hypocritical we are when it comes to war. Even though in the US you have to be 18 to join the military, no one bats an eye if someone just of age chooses to do so. But if you are 30 and want to date an 18 year old... THATS SUS AF! The 18 year old could choose to literally die for a lifeless, soulless idea that is "patriotism" but as soon as they choose to bang someone 5+ years older then them they are being manipulated...

Man fuck the hypocrisy, truly. :

[Mr. Cat]

Children fighting in the war is very common, not just quite. I know for certain that every at-war country with poor economy has children fighting in their army. In my country, it wasn't even the case of "we are out of capable adults", but more of "I fake my age so I can fight for my country". Patriotism is a hell of a drug, I tell you.

[IntoSunlitDays]

There were alot of children in Vietnam during the war. I remember seeing images of mountains of dead Vietnamese kids taken by US troops. It is also common knowledge that terrorist organizations such as ISIS kidnap children and force them to commit murders. I heard about an ISIS member forcing his 14 year old son to rape and kill a woman and her baby because her husband left the country and reported war crimes to authorities leading to an arrest. Countries and organizations that force children to partake in war should be bombed to all hell. Do whatever you want, but leave women and children OUT of it.

[Malt]

Child soldiers are a mark of desperation.  Either the country has exhausted its supply of actual military age males, like those waning days of WWII for the Axis, or they have some ideology that doesn't appeal to neurologically mature humans, so they must resort to 'grooming' adolescents to fight their fight.  Boko Harum being the best example I can think of.  But yeah, major powers are guilty in this arena as well with the pop culture bombarding young boys with heroic imagery and playthings about being a soldier.

Sure there's a natural inclination for boys to play fight already and one can argue that something like GI Joe was popular because that's what the boys liked. But at the same time, it's well documented how the US Military cooperates with Hollywood to make the military seem as cool as possible to young audiences.  Still, it's not at all at the same overt level as a West African terrorist organization like Boko Harum where they straight up take the boys away from their families or pick up orphans and completely control their intake of information.  And it's not at all the same as a totalitarian state that already has raised children to worship their supreme leader so that when it comes time to bolster depleted ranks at the end of a losing war, the children obey and pick up a rifle.

It's unethical because one is purposefully limiting a child's options about what they can do with their life to serve the selfish interest of The State or the Dear Leader or whatever the powers that be are in that situation.

Bringing back around to on topic, which is worse?  Grooming a child to suck a cock or grooming a child to kill the enemy in a war?
I think you all can guess which one I'd pick as worse.

You do NOT need to groom a child for war. You can just force them to do so. The notion of consent isn't needed.

Drinking age in the US tends to be around 21. That is when the government considers someone mentally mature enough to allow them for this. The age of joining the military is 18 and can even be slightly lower with permissions etc. They can be drafted against their will/consent too. Food for thought.

In general "child warriors" is a real and ongoing problem. It is much easier to use a child for war if you do not care about the wider society. This is true for warlords and despotic countries alike. It is odd that the "think of the children" crowd never thinks of these children.