Pedo Support Community 7.0

Discussion, Personal Experience, and Advice => Pedo Chat => Topic started by: Shady on 15 January, 2026, 15:04:29

Poll
Question: Do you think about logic when reading or writing sex scenes?
Option 1: Not at all. Stories are to be enjoyed, not nitpicked. votes: 1
Option 2: Not much really, unless it's too obvious. votes: 1
Option 3: Yes, I think logic and entertainment should go hand in hand votes: 12
Title: Common se(n)x
Post by: Shady on 15 January, 2026, 15:04:29
I wonder if any of us who had read or written sex scenes care about the logic of the plot/description. Like for example a 7 year old boy being trained to anally receive an adult cock that is 18cm (7 inch) in length and 13cm (5 inch) in diameter might seem like too much of an illogical point for some viewers/writers.

I want to make this poll because I like size difference in my writing, and wonder how much difference should I showcase.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: Lillab on 15 January, 2026, 15:23:54
I think writing, especially in this genre, should not be very much about playing to your audience. Instead, you are sharing a part of yourself. You are letting people see and experience the things you love and fantasize about. Forget about everyone else. You are the only audience member that matters when you write, and everyone else are just voyeurs enjoying seeing you get off. Those who don't like it can just go somewhere else. There will always be at least some people out there that both like you and are like you. The only thing about your audience you should worry about is whether you are expressing your fantasy clearly and effectively helping them experience what you like to experience.

It reminds me on one of my rules in business. Never cater to what other people want, unless they have money and are telling you they will pay you to do so. Don't work for imaginary people in your head or in other people's heads. If they won't pay you for it, then their suggestions aren't worth much.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: on the rocks on 16 January, 2026, 02:06:50
If something is too absurd, it pulls me out of the narrative, so I'll say yeah, I want enough logic and realism to make the experience immersive.
It's why I don't get into most horror or most superhero content out there.  It fails the realism test for me.

For erotic fiction, I gravitate toward scenarios and events that I could see happening to me.  Or at least some lucky mo-fo. ;) :lol
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: nyarla on 16 January, 2026, 15:27:59
For erotic fiction, yes. I tent to enjoy the absurd, the abstract and cosmicism in my general literature, but if the focus situational like erotica yeah I want it to make sense so I can be better immersed in it.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: Shady on 17 January, 2026, 13:52:11
Quote from: Lillab on 15 January, 2026, 15:23:54I think writing, especially in this genre, should not be very much about playing to your audience. Instead, you are sharing a part of yourself. You are letting people see and experience the things you love and fantasize about. Forget about everyone else. You are the only audience member that matters when you write, and everyone else are just voyeurs enjoying seeing you get off. Those who don't like it can just go somewhere else. There will always be at least some people out there that both like you and are like you. The only thing about your audience you should worry about is whether you are expressing your fantasy clearly and effectively helping them experience what you like to experience.


I think you're quite right that I should prioritize my own feeling about my writing first, but I am already. I'm not letting anyone dictates my writing, so don't worry lol. It's just that I tend to go way off when I let my personal opinion determines the plot, so I'd like some comments from others to kind of ground my writing, making it make more sense and preventing me from deleting everything and start over again just because of an illogical detail.

Quote from: on the rocks on 16 January, 2026, 02:06:50For erotic fiction, I gravitate toward scenarios and events that I could see happening to me.  Or at least some luck mo-fo. ;) :lol

Quote from: nyarla on 16 January, 2026, 15:27:59For erotic fiction, yes. I tent to enjoy the absurd, the abstract and cosmicism in my general literature, but if the focus situational like erotica yeah I want it to make sense so I can be better immersed in it.

Is a family that somehow only has males and they're all gay too absurd for you guys, lol? I'm planning to create a slice of life story that is about an all gay, all pedo family.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: And I Love Her on 18 January, 2026, 00:24:17
The problem is not reality, but consistency. Superpowers? Magic Dildoes? Pedo planets? There's no limit to the fantasies you can dream up. However, once it's set, it needs to hold up. I hate reading stories that lack consistency, just like I hate reading stories that lack imagery.

So if your boy is going to  take a 7 inch cock up the ass, fine! But what are your parameters? If the setting is a real boy in our world with today's technology, then stick with it! 7 inches is a lot, so describe the process of training for that. Describe the way it felt, how it wasn't always plesant (because it wouldn't be), the long timeframe to get there, the types of dildoes and lube, where the lover got them, the excitement/nerves of opening them up.

Just don't be the author who says: "Jason grabbed him in the locker room, ripped off his pants, shoved 7 inches up there and gave Johnny the best orgasm of his 7-year-old life!" That's inconsistent with the setting. If I wanted that quality of storytelling, I'd just go on PornHub.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: Lillab on 18 January, 2026, 03:05:05
I completely agree with And I Love Her's point about consistency. You can set up whatever universe you want, just be consistent. It also comes back to what I was saying about expressing yourself clearly. When you aren't consistent, it makes it harder for the reader to follow along and understand what is happening, like is it magic or something different about your universe, is this particular boy special in some way? There is also a big difference between something being unlikely, and being actually unrealistic. Your family of all pedo friendly gay boys is unlikely, but it could happen. Each person is plausible on their own, and so it's fine to have them all together. No story out there is likely to happen exactly the way it is told when you add up all the different facts, and that's fine. When something feels a little off to you, maybe you just need to do a better job of explaining how we got there. The worst details to be unrealistic with are ones that interfere with being able to visualize a scene.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: Shady on 18 January, 2026, 07:29:03
Quote from: And I Love Her on 18 January, 2026, 00:24:17Just don't be the author who says: "Jason grabbed him in the locker room, ripped off his pants, shoved 7 inches up there and gave Johnny the best orgasm of his 7-year-old life!" That's inconsistent with the setting. If I wanted that quality of storytelling, I'd just go on PornHub.

Lol yeah even 12 year old me would agree that plot is a no go.

Quote from: Lillab on 18 January, 2026, 03:05:05Is this particular boy special in some way?

I'm actually planning to put subtle supernatural twists into the story, like curses or blessings, instead of trying to explain it scientifically. I know scientific knowledge isn't exactly my forte so I ain't wasting my time and mood for that.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: nyarla on 18 January, 2026, 14:39:06
Internal logic is not realism, you can write a plot in whatever setting you enjoy Shady, as long as it is consistent with itself. In this case, in my opinion. As I said I prefer my erotica this way.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: TooLittleTime on 19 January, 2026, 16:33:47
Everyone has different tastes. I prefer realism. Things can stretch for sure, especially the backstory. Things do to an amazing degree in real life as I have learned. But when it comes to sex itself, nothing works for me erotically if it can't or likely wouldn't work in real life.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: girlsmom on 20 January, 2026, 16:05:12
I have to agree with TLT. Realism works for me more so than crazy fantasies. Even in adult porn I like the amateur stuff or the hidden cam stuff. I can easily put myself into those types of stories and that makes it more erotic to me. Having dungeons and dragons and supermen just gets me out of the story.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: EllieLover on 20 January, 2026, 17:47:02
There's room for artistic liberty, but overall I prefer my stories be grounded in reality, or at least be consistent in its logic. If some girl is being fucked up the ass by a dragon the size of a building, I want at least some mention of why she isn't split in two.

Coming up with crazy scenarios and then figuring out how to make those scenarios plausible is part of the joy of writing for me. Create a world, then come up with a story that makes sense within the confines of that world.
Title: Re: Common se(n)x
Post by: on the rocks on 22 January, 2026, 00:59:23
Quote from: Shady on 17 January, 2026, 13:52:11Is a family that somehow only has males and they're all gay too absurd for you guys, lol? I'm planning to create a slice of life story that is about an all gay, all pedo family.

Sounds fine to me.  One or two throw-away lines about using surrogates or adoption to explain how the family has kids but no uteri and you're good. ;)