Hello Guys!
I hope I am not breaking any rules becuase I love this site and all of you. I love that I am not the only one out there that loves children like we do and there is many of us. It would be really cool to start a relationship with some of you and get to know one another. I love hearing about your experience and why you find kids so beautiful and sexy. So hit me if you are interested It's been a long time since I was on here last and it's good to be back. I have my Tox account online from 3pm to 12:30am UTC time. I can only be on during the day because I got a close encounter with my girlfriend she almost found out what I am into. So nights are off the table for now.
Tox ID: 00BEF694F34E91421CC7367A6B448F6700C3C39CA8DE0A200C6119FAD6FEC047F884CB280B97
Man, I played around with QTox some time ago and it seemed to be very unstable and flawed. Any progress with it?
qTox is a pain in the ass to get up an running, there is little to no instructions on how to get it up and running especially on Tails OS. You have to set the IP settings and port number everytime you reboot Tails and turn on Proxy to automatic in Tails settings. I also found out its best to export your profile everytime before you close the app. Eventually you get it up and running. Its just takes 5 mintues or so. I haven't had it crash yet since I am running the latest Tails OS.
I have used Session before which is an App. I think the risk is low for people to chat on a tool like this as long as they are not exchanging anything illegal.
qTox can be a pain in the butt to initially set up, especially on Tails OS. However, if you do move it to your persistent folder it should remember the settings and once set up correctly start up in seconds.
There also is aTox, which is Tox for Android. And just like you people already said as long as you don't exchange anything illegal it's perfectly fine to use because it can also be configured to run through Tor.
Just keep in mind that only one instance of Tox should be running using the same profile at a time, otherwise it'll do funky stuff and break, lose messages in the ether or send them multiple times and so on.
:P
Quote from: LittleGirllover on 02 July, 2024, 00:10:19Hello Guys!
I hope I am not breaking any rules becuase I love this site and all of you. I love that I am not the only one out there that loves children like we do and there is many of us. It would be really cool to start a relationship with some of you and get to know one another. I love hearing about your experience and why you find kids so beautiful and sexy. So hit me if you are interested It's been a long time since I was on here last and it's good to be back. I have my Tox account online from 3pm to 12:30am UTC time. I can only be on during the day because I got a close encounter with my girlfriend she almost found out what I am into. So nights are off the table for now.
Tox ID: 00BEF694F34E91421CC7367A6B448F6700C3C39CA8DE0A200C6119FAD6FEC047F884CB280B97
I would absolutely love to chat with you, but unfortunately I'm not using Tox. Session has been quite wonky lately too. I have downloaded Teleguard but haven't used it yet.
Hey Everyone,
Thank you for the tips and points. I do use session as well. I haven't tried teleguard yet, but I am using telegram talking with a pedomom. We have been talking daily for the past few weeks. Would love to make more friends.
Hey Guys, just checking in if anyone is interested would love to chat. I am open to Session messenger as well.
hey. i would love to chat! but unfortunately i don't really use qtox. give me your session id.
Quote from: LittleGirllover on 08 July, 2024, 22:18:25Hey Everyone,
Thank you for the tips and points. I do use session as well. I haven't tried teleguard yet, but I am using telegram talking with a pedomom. We have been talking daily for the past few weeks. Would love to make more friends.
I will send you a PM with my Session ID. After trying Teleguard for a bit, I find it to be more stable than Session but that it is still a bit suspect in the security department. And I really don't want to be *that* guy, but IMO you should be highly suspect about said pedomom on Telegram.
I recently used Wire (at his suggestion) to chat with another man about his very intense experiences as a boy. Supposedly very secure.
I would not use Telegram, all the experts I've read say it is not secure at all.
i'm on qtox, session and wire. love to chat with other like-minded friends, always a pleasure to keep in cointact like that. PM for details
I'm on utox and session and would love to chat with people! Definitely PM me.
i have qtox and session, if anyone wants to know my id u can send me a message here
Never heard of qtox but I have used sessions.
I have problem with my Qtox, does'nt seems to work. Spinning circle on all contacts.
For a while I had my TOX ID listed in my profile but found most who reached out were lurkers of this forum who were looking for content. (
All of the chat apps have times when they are wonky, just be patient and find one that works for you. I use session, tox, wire and teleguard. they all work just enough but not perfectly.
I have also installed Tox now and I hope to make new friends and talk about our common grounds but not for trading illegal stuff.
Feel free to add me: EEFEC9AFA1DECC2A93C774BBE63F94000F20FD0D5D062A58DCFA7DC1BC85573BC1891AC4CB5D
Hello everyone.
Would love to chat with others on Tox.
3030A40DE069C0065CF7E15F3188903D291CB7189BFD44A17048D37C0BC2E4581CFBF8B941FB
I thought apps like Session were an absolute no go, because of security? The advice I was given was never use an app on your mobile!
Quote from: thatchattyfem on 01 October, 2024, 22:58:37I thought apps like Session were an absolute no go, because of security? The advice I was given was never use an app on your mobile!
That is accurate. Phones leak data like a mesh bag leaks water.
Quote from: thatchattyfem on 01 October, 2024, 22:58:37I thought apps like Session were an absolute no go, because of security? The advice I was given was never use an app on your mobile!
Session itself is safe (-ish), because it's open source and works through Tor.
As far as phones go, no one really knows how much they spy on you.
It's almost guaranteed that they spy to
some extent, though how much is anyone's guess.
A lot of people - the vast majority, in fact - watch cp on their phones. That's just the nature of today's world.
Not only watch, but also record it on their phones too.
If there was a large scale, systematic spying of files against known cp databases, you'd see people getting arrested left and right, and the cp scene would be pretty much empty.
If you wanna be on the safe side though, you can still use Session on your desktop OS, be that Linux or Windows.
The security issue with phone/mobile OS's probably isn't that someone is constantly monitoring everything hoping to catch "bad" activity. It's that the phone accumulates untold information of how it's used and what it's used for. A treasure trove of information about anyone who falls under investigation for whatever reason.
Hi! Can someone send me a message on Qtox, not sure if it works, thx!
Quote from: on the rocks on 03 October, 2024, 01:12:53The security issue with phone/mobile OS's probably isn't that someone is constantly monitoring everything hoping to catch "bad" activity. It's that the phone accumulates untold information of how it's used and what it's used for. A treasure trove of information about anyone who falls under investigation for whatever reason.
Good point. Although I'd argue that LEA can't easily break into people's phones.
If you are a high value target, they'll put in the effort/resources.
But if you are a high value target, you shouldn't be using a phone anyway :lol
Or even chatting here on PSC, for that matter.
Different phones are different about how much they spy on you, but both Session and Signal, by my understanding, have really good encrypted sandboxes. So as long as you don't take anything *out* of those apps directly, as opposed to doing some silly bullshit with note to self to get it on a secure machine, you can just wipe whenever you need to.
Quote from: Rivers on 02 October, 2024, 03:13:33If there was a large scale, systematic spying of files against known cp databases, you'd see people getting arrested left and right, and the cp scene would be pretty much empty.
Ironically, I have been hearing a lot of tales about people who end up under investigation after their iCloud flags a pic of their kid in the bathtub as CP.
People can believe what they want, but I don't think one should base the question on how "much" they're spying on you, rather than
if they are spying on you. If they're spying
at all that's not a tenable to good OpSec. Full stop. Anything beyond that is suggesting that one can be careless and lucky because other individuals have gotten away with it.
Yes, there's a certain level of, "You don't matter enough for them to look that hard at," here, but you cannot find safety in being the smaller fish in the pond all the time. It reminds me of my days when I used to deal drugs, and the cops would go and arrest all the low-level dealers who would have absolutely no security. The reason why they didn't keep any security, is because they would simply snitch on someone bigger as a means to avoid arrest.
The police have no problem rounding up a bunch of smaller fish, if they think a few of them will bait in a bigger one. Not only does it make them look good by padding arrest numbers and showing them pursuing people committing these crimes, but at the end of the day it often will lead to bigger catches. So there's no reason to suggest that police won't go after small fish, the
only thing at play here is how difficult it is for them. If companies like Apple are already choosing to scan peoples' data and match the data found there against known CSAM, how far will they have to go and what excuse will they need to use to justify selling lists of names to the police that contain data-sets profiled to be likely criminals? Right now, Apple justifies identifying and reporting CP as part of a crusade against child abuse, but
also we all know that they probably don't want that on their servers either. I sincerely doubt they want people using their services to FaceTime minors either, so how long until they just hand
that data over to law enforcement too? "So don't use FaceTime," you might say, but how do you know there's not something else like it sending telemetry off to Apple the whole time without your knowledge anyway?
If I couldn't access the darkweb with anything but a phone, I would just stay off of it entirely. Otherwise I'm doing nothing but willfully submitting data that can be used to profile, trace and identify me to a third-party who has zero interest or reason to protect that data, and every reason to sell it to someone else. I think the only reason we haven't The Great Pedo Roundup is because 1. All that data is more valuable to advertisers, so they're buying it first and 2. Cops only want small fish to get big fish, so keeping the pond stocked is necessary.
Edit:
Oh, and once again to beat a dead horse... The police don't need to break your encryption. They simply need to make you miserable enough to compel you to disclose the key. Cases like the San Bernadino shooter's iPhone are different. That man was already staring down a death sentence, so saying, "Unlock your phone for us or else," doesn't do shit, so they had to go spend a million bucks to pay a security-research firm to break it. But if the cops picked any one of us up tomorrow, and said, "Give us the key to unlock this phone, or you're going to spend the next 18 months in jail under contempt of court charges," that produces a whole hell of a lot more leverage.
Quote from: LikelyHuman on 06 October, 2024, 19:18:28Quote from: Rivers on 02 October, 2024, 03:13:33But if the cops picked any one of us up tomorrow, and said, "Give us the key to unlock this phone, or you're going to spend the next 18 months in jail under contempt of court charges," that produces a whole hell of a lot more leverage.
18 months for civil contempt is a better thing than 5 or more years on CP charges and a lifetime being a RSO.
(Fixed quote -LH)
Quote from: LateComer on 06 October, 2024, 20:40:34Quote from: LikelyHuman on 06 October, 2024, 19:18:28Quote from: Rivers on 02 October, 2024, 03:13:33But if the cops picked any one of us up tomorrow, and said, "Give us the key to unlock this phone, or you're going to spend the next 18 months in jail under contempt of court charges," that produces a whole hell of a lot more leverage.
18 months for civil contempt is a better thing than 5 or more years on CP charges and a lifetime being a RSO.
(Fixed quote -LH)
Sure, but do you really want to do 18 months in a jail as a suspected pedophile either? That's 1 and 1/2 years, and who knows if you're going to kept in protective custody, general population, or isolation.
Neither is best but between contempt and prison I would want contempt.
Quote from: LateComer on 06 October, 2024, 23:10:53Neither is best but between contempt and prison I would want contempt.
I genuinely wonder. I mean, on paper, it kind of sounds better, but I know a few people who have been to prison and say they couldn't wait to get there after being in the jail for 1-2 years waiting for trial, sentencing, etc. There are aspects to jail that a lot of people don't realize are actually less favorable than prison, if you're doing a long stay. I mean, among complaining about no good commissary items, I had friends complain about the lack of protection in jail versus in prison. In prison, it's different; you end up just getting assimilated into whatever race group you belong to, and are then "protected", but also expected to fight. In jail, they're much more often controlled by members of local street gangs that are in the jails at the moment, and then just random people who can't really do anything about it. Plus, that's when you're just a guy doing something nobody really cares about, but they
do ask you what you're in for, and if you don't tell they assume you're a snitch, which is almost as bad (if not worse) than being a pedo. Because of that, it will more than likely be deemed that you need extra protection, which they're required to provide, but jails are often not equipped for a secured-wing like a prison would be. Mostly because people aren't expected to have long stays in jail, so they usually just stick them in solitary confinement.
So... Best case scenario, you go and spend a year and a half in a shitty jail cell, and it just sucks because you eat shitty food and are bored out of your mind. More likely, they shove you into solitary, and you go a little bonkers from it. Worse case scenario, you get shivved to death.
All the same things
could happen in prison, I suppose, and so really the only thing better is the idea you won't be on a registry at the end of it. But that's provided you survive, and if you do, will you come out of it unscathed, even mentally so?
Oh, and it also just occurred to me, even the length of 1 and 1/2 years is optimistic. Because that's 1 and 1/2 years
after you went to trial and plead the 5th. Who knows how long you already spent awaiting that trial.
Quote from: LikelyHuman on 06 October, 2024, 19:18:28Ironically, I have been hearing a lot of tales about people who end up under investigation after their iCloud flags a pic of their kid in the bathtub as CP.
But that's the cloud, not the phone.
Everything that's uploaded to a cloud service gets systematically checked, they say so themselves.
Checking a user's actual phone content is a whole different matter.
There were plans to scan devices in 2021 but Apple paused the software rollout due to public outcry. They finally declared the service dead and unreleasable last year. Despite this I would not engage with on-topic stuff on a phone.
An onion is our friend, as per my avatar (although this friendship might end one day). A smartphone is our enemy, as per common sense.
Smartphones and ontopic things just don't go in pairs. I treat mine like a useful, but nosy coworker. It knows some things, it knows some embarrassing or private things too, but nothing even remotely tied to pedophilia, pedo stuff, pedo chats, pedo friends, pedo life.
The same with clouds. Once you upload something to a cloud, consider it public, forever. Encryption doesn't matter, one day it will be broken anyway. Let's assume you're 20, uploaded some encrypted CP to a cloud, and then you're 40 and you get the knock, because even if you deleted the file and forgot about it, all it did was hiding it from you, and now they automatically scanned all files they ever stored, and surprise, their scanner pointed them right to you. Quantum computing, AI, it doesn't really matter. The tech surely will be there.
Here's my qtox ID: 999AE4192BDD8F89632E1984AF35EDCEC6175FCB62A0DCE44D0F70C4FA42CB1C2D8F08C3EFC7
feel free to send my a message
Hey all, more than happy to chat! My ID is: 09C765D3A4F04AACAF87F44636697FF50AEADF5D5A927A930AEFBE18195F4C035A4F763CA87B
My thoughts on a couple apps
I do not trust Telegram. never have. Now given recent events with its owner being arrested...
My chat platform of choice these days is Session. Mainly because it runs over TOR.
Quote from: thatchattyfem on 01 October, 2024, 22:58:37I thought apps like Session were an absolute no go, because of security? The advice I was given was never use an app on your mobile!
Never use an app on your mobile is good advice. Not only for data leakage but what if someone found the phone? Or the phone was open and someone happened by?
Easier to be discrete on a laptop.
Session runs over TOR so I trust it more than other apps
Quote from: Pat975 on 23 October, 2024, 03:58:49Quote from: thatchattyfem on 01 October, 2024, 22:58:37I thought apps like Session were an absolute no go, because of security? The advice I was given was never use an app on your mobile!
Never use an app on your mobile is good advice. Not only for data leakage but what if someone found the phone? Or the phone was open and someone happened by?
Easier to be discrete on a laptop.
Session runs over TOR so I trust it more than other apps
Not Tor. Lokinet. Similar but not same. Another technical person in our wider community (not here) told me about doubts with Session. Text is encrypted. Media encryption has flaws. I would not use Session for anything but text.
Quote from: LateComer on 23 October, 2024, 04:20:21Not Tor. Lokinet. Similar but not same. Another technical person in our wider community (not here) told me about doubts with Session. Text is encrypted. Media encryption has flaws. I would not use Session for anything but text.
Thank you! Good to know.
So... In your opinion... Best app for privacy / security / anonymity?
Quote from: Pat975 on 23 October, 2024, 04:22:36Quote from: LateComer on 23 October, 2024, 04:20:21Not Tor. Lokinet. Similar but not same. Another technical person in our wider community (not here) told me about doubts with Session. Text is encrypted. Media encryption has flaws. I would not use Session for anything but text.
Thank you! Good to know.
So... In your opinion... Best app for privacy / security / anonymity?
I trust Session for text. Beside that Tor is the only software I trust for anonymity now.
if any one wants to chat on session
054e996cb12bcc4bcec03372b7b8aa93fb90dab8a89e32cd416ade6ee534653246
Quote from: LikelyHuman on 06 October, 2024, 19:18:28Quote from: Rivers on 02 October, 2024, 03:13:33If there was a large scale, systematic spying of files against known cp databases, you'd see people getting arrested left and right, and the cp scene would be pretty much empty.
Ironically, I have been hearing a lot of tales about people who end up under investigation after their iCloud flags a pic of their kid in the bathtub as CP.
People can believe what they want, but I don't think one should base the question on how "much" they're spying on you, rather than if they are spying on you. If they're spying at all that's not a tenable to good OpSec. Full stop. Anything beyond that is suggesting that one can be careless and lucky because other individuals have gotten away with it.
Yes, there's a certain level of, "You don't matter enough for them to look that hard at," here, but you cannot find safety in being the smaller fish in the pond all the time. It reminds me of my days when I used to deal drugs, and the cops would go and arrest all the low-level dealers who would have absolutely no security. The reason why they didn't keep any security, is because they would simply snitch on someone bigger as a means to avoid arrest.
The police have no problem rounding up a bunch of smaller fish, if they think a few of them will bait in a bigger one. Not only does it make them look good by padding arrest numbers and showing them pursuing people committing these crimes, but at the end of the day it often will lead to bigger catches. So there's no reason to suggest that police won't go after small fish, the only thing at play here is how difficult it is for them. If companies like Apple are already choosing to scan peoples' data and match the data found there against known CSAM, how far will they have to go and what excuse will they need to use to justify selling lists of names to the police that contain data-sets profiled to be likely criminals? Right now, Apple justifies identifying and reporting CP as part of a crusade against child abuse, but also we all know that they probably don't want that on their servers either. I sincerely doubt they want people using their services to FaceTime minors either, so how long until they just hand that data over to law enforcement too? "So don't use FaceTime," you might say, but how do you know there's not something else like it sending telemetry off to Apple the whole time without your knowledge anyway?
If I couldn't access the darkweb with anything but a phone, I would just stay off of it entirely. Otherwise I'm doing nothing but willfully submitting data that can be used to profile, trace and identify me to a third-party who has zero interest or reason to protect that data, and every reason to sell it to someone else. I think the only reason we haven't The Great Pedo Roundup is because 1. All that data is more valuable to advertisers, so they're buying it first and 2. Cops only want small fish to get big fish, so keeping the pond stocked is necessary.
Edit:
Oh, and once again to beat a dead horse... The police don't need to break your encryption. They simply need to make you miserable enough to compel you to disclose the key. Cases like the San Bernadino shooter's iPhone are different. That man was already staring down a death sentence, so saying, "Unlock your phone for us or else," doesn't do shit, so they had to go spend a million bucks to pay a security-research firm to break it. But if the cops picked any one of us up tomorrow, and said, "Give us the key to unlock this phone, or you're going to spend the next 18 months in jail under contempt of court charges," that produces a whole hell of a lot more leverage.
Just wanted to clear up some claims in this post, not to be rude or anything towards the poster, but Apple is NOT scanning for CSAM, They had plans to do so, but ended up backing off of them because a lot of researchers said it was a bad idea.
The story about the kid in the bathtub or what not is actually Google. They not only scan images for matching CP but they also use algorithms to flag photos that COULD be CP.
Quote from: crunchybidad on 30 December, 2024, 13:19:47Quote from: LikelyHuman on 06 October, 2024, 19:18:28Quote from: Rivers on 02 October, 2024, 03:13:33If there was a large scale, systematic spying of files against known cp databases, you'd see people getting arrested left and right, and the cp scene would be pretty much empty.
Ironically, I have been hearing a lot of tales about people who end up under investigation after their iCloud flags a pic of their kid in the bathtub as CP.
People can believe what they want, but I don't think one should base the question on how "much" they're spying on you, rather than if they are spying on you. If they're spying at all that's not a tenable to good OpSec. Full stop. Anything beyond that is suggesting that one can be careless and lucky because other individuals have gotten away with it.
Yes, there's a certain level of, "You don't matter enough for them to look that hard at," here, but you cannot find safety in being the smaller fish in the pond all the time. It reminds me of my days when I used to deal drugs, and the cops would go and arrest all the low-level dealers who would have absolutely no security. The reason why they didn't keep any security, is because they would simply snitch on someone bigger as a means to avoid arrest.
The police have no problem rounding up a bunch of smaller fish, if they think a few of them will bait in a bigger one. Not only does it make them look good by padding arrest numbers and showing them pursuing people committing these crimes, but at the end of the day it often will lead to bigger catches. So there's no reason to suggest that police won't go after small fish, the only thing at play here is how difficult it is for them. If companies like Apple are already choosing to scan peoples' data and match the data found there against known CSAM, how far will they have to go and what excuse will they need to use to justify selling lists of names to the police that contain data-sets profiled to be likely criminals? Right now, Apple justifies identifying and reporting CP as part of a crusade against child abuse, but also we all know that they probably don't want that on their servers either. I sincerely doubt they want people using their services to FaceTime minors either, so how long until they just hand that data over to law enforcement too? "So don't use FaceTime," you might say, but how do you know there's not something else like it sending telemetry off to Apple the whole time without your knowledge anyway?
If I couldn't access the darkweb with anything but a phone, I would just stay off of it entirely. Otherwise I'm doing nothing but willfully submitting data that can be used to profile, trace and identify me to a third-party who has zero interest or reason to protect that data, and every reason to sell it to someone else. I think the only reason we haven't The Great Pedo Roundup is because 1. All that data is more valuable to advertisers, so they're buying it first and 2. Cops only want small fish to get big fish, so keeping the pond stocked is necessary.
Edit:
Oh, and once again to beat a dead horse... The police don't need to break your encryption. They simply need to make you miserable enough to compel you to disclose the key. Cases like the San Bernadino shooter's iPhone are different. That man was already staring down a death sentence, so saying, "Unlock your phone for us or else," doesn't do shit, so they had to go spend a million bucks to pay a security-research firm to break it. But if the cops picked any one of us up tomorrow, and said, "Give us the key to unlock this phone, or you're going to spend the next 18 months in jail under contempt of court charges," that produces a whole hell of a lot more leverage.
Just wanted to clear up some claims in this post, not to be rude or anything towards the poster, but Apple is NOT scanning for CSAM, They had plans to do so, but ended up backing off of them because a lot of researchers said it was a bad idea.
No worries, glad you clarified. You're positive they didn't actually identify someone and get them prosecuted before all the outcry though? I could swear they had actually been getting people busted before admitting it was a bad idea.
Say hello id love to chat
Quote from: MmmYess on 07 December, 2024, 00:10:17if any one wants to chat on session
xxxxx
New session account 05e3da91aebb3abb47e1648a11b214731c4a1da288652d96cf6fc20642cbfe115e
My session 05bad31b1dd8fc1386dd250019f3fd1b8923097936a49e1d58a1c220c4c58e9a24
TOX
B34B63349B23A65CA303FE06BD0D5B5DEB7827C8EAFDC9D3171675E8FB35A32265A52E26C8A1
Do people still use qTox? I logged into it for a full week once and nothing! Never see anyone online on it.
Quote from: thatchattyfem on 18 February, 2025, 00:24:22Do people still use qTox? I logged into it for a full week once and nothing! Never see anyone online on it.
If they're anything like me they forgot their password
Quote from: Red Locust on 18 February, 2025, 10:11:56Quote from: thatchattyfem on 18 February, 2025, 00:24:22Do people still use qTox? I logged into it for a full week once and nothing! Never see anyone online on it.
If they're anything like me they forgot their password
Haha, yeah fairs enough. That's happened to me more than once!
I am also free for a chat, feel free to add me on Tox
Unfortunately for me, it seems that fellow chatters boil down to two types:
1. People who almost immediately start in with the rape/degrading talk or sending HC CP, which annoys the fuck out of me.
2. People who at first seem like they're going to be good chatting partners, but not long after the initial communication, they ghost you and you never hear from them again.
At this point, I find that in my judgement, finding people to chat with is a pointless endeavour.
I wasn't really on it much, nor did I see people on there much when I was on. It's all about timing, I guess.
Yeah, chats start out great, then you get ghosted, would love to have a regular chat bud to develop a friendship with
Always keen to chat, but I don't really enjoy anyone going to full on,asking lots of questions about me, my family or worse, asking me for cp. If you want a relatively normal convo, I can be found on sess 0528d324b31cc8c9530b614236064ec09d0b56c0c3cb5b10cc139a6bd37b225b6d
37D9F38B19D8CD69B522B57B68DCD4BBED736A9D884C2AF403E9F57D9643D650F50775B8BFB3 is my qtox ID.. I am also open to chat. I am probably needing help learning how to maneuver the chat site.
I created QTox username: 3BD668EFBAE40EFA28325C83E7FE7374CCE6580F1569509B456C8D0EDCCE40057547BF63488A
Send a friend request and tell me you are from PSC
After so many years looking on Clearnet for places and people to chat with I have pretty much given up. These new chat apps feel very dangerous to me because of all the stories I hear about pedos being caught or catfished by LEOs on them. I am too afraid and too paranoid to risk it for now.
Nothing worse that making a great friend on chat only for them to get spooked and vanish.....
:(
sess 05f013e62fdc0ac15b857a6843283623becba4e24b03902dfa44f01ddf1b802f5a
Yeah I agree, just when you think you have a great connection the dude ghosts you....
Actually I think time zones make it worse, you have a great couple of chats only to discover you are on opposite ends of the planet, and your couple of chats were just blind luck, but hooking up regularly just cannot work.
Quote from: 4everYoung on 26 May, 2025, 06:08:56Actually I think time zones make it worse, you have a great couple of chats only to discover you are on opposite ends of the planet, and your couple of chats were just blind luck, but hooking up regularly just cannot work.
That's why I prefer PMs or email (of course address created through Tor and used only for this single personality).
Quote from: Shatterhand on 09 May, 2025, 17:04:53After so many years looking on Clearnet for places and people to chat with I have pretty much given up. These new chat apps feel very dangerous to me because of all the stories I hear about pedos being caught or catfished by LEOs on them. I am too afraid and too paranoid to risk it for now.
Yeah, I hear you. I long for the days of Yahoo Instant Messenger where you could have pedo chats all the time and not get caught because Yahoo was filled with the most moronic workers on the planet.
Quote from: 4everYoung on 26 May, 2025, 06:08:56Actually I think time zones make it worse, you have a great couple of chats only to discover you are on opposite ends of the planet, and your couple of chats were just blind luck, but hooking up regularly just cannot work.
I think it's a pipe dream that most of us share. That wish for meaningful sexual contact beyond masturbation and fantasy.
Yeah, but I keep hoping. I did have a contact the lasted for few years, but he eventually disappeared. For while it lasted it was amazing. Maybe it can happen again.
Quote from: 4everYoung on 28 May, 2025, 05:20:07Yeah, but I keep hoping. I did have a contact the lasted for few years, but he eventually disappeared. For while it lasted it was amazing. Maybe it can happen again.
Well I wish you luck, I hope you find that again.
Good luck you guys :)
Updated session account
059536069e882a9aae34dcb93b5a5e68f5b60e7e74a4915d9f632ad6f79259ef75
hi everyone mine is
A47284B2EF1DE05F76696D2564D5E2666E8CE0552D09A1307C096CE65135633CB9E377135C8B
but is qtox still teh ebst i have problems getting it to work.